Global survey shows comms service providers losing 13.1% of revenues to leakage and fraud

Revenue losses and fraud may be higher on the agenda for communication service providers (CSPs) following independent research released by Neural Technologies. A new global survey of 113 CSPs has found that these losses have now reached 13.1% of gross revenues.

Let’s take a moment to consider that, says Jeremy Cowan. For every $100 earned by telecom network operators and or service providers, $13.10 will fail to reach the bottom line either through fraud or failed systems and processes.

The survey team talked to service providers in eight regions; Africa, Middle East, Western Europe, Central Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan), Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, North America, and Caribbean & Latin America.

Inevitably, there are significant regional variations – Central Asia reports the highest level of revenue loss at 17.0% and Western Europe the lowest at 8.2% – but the findings are in line with similar research carried out over the last decade and more, including by the US-based Communications Fraud Control Association (CFCA). Other surveys using a similar methodology to that of Neural Technologies (and their research partners, Milner Strategic Marketing) have shown global losses among communication service providers (CSPs) ranging from 10.5% (2004) to 13.6% (2007).  So there are good reasons to believe that these figures are accurate.

This year the losses break down regionally as follows:
Western Europe                        8.2%
Eastern Europe                       15.8%
North America                        11.5%
Caribbean & Latin America    9.9%
Africa                                        16.7%
Middle East                             12.9%
Central Asia                             17.0%
South East Asia                         8.6%

Revenue loss by cause

What are the greatest threats to revenue?

As in previous studies, the greatest source of revenue losses globally lies in poor processes and procedures, although there are variations by region (see slide above). Other significant factors include failures in credit management, external fraud, fraud by other service providers, rating and charging errors, poor systems integration and internal fraud.

Mistakes and failures may outnumber calculated fraud, but service providers cannot be complacent. Only concerted efforts by well-drilled teams (either internal or external) are likely to curb these losses, say service providers.

Internet of Things – opportunity or revenue threat?

Looking at the Internet of Things in particular, the survey asked if IoT was perceived as an opportunity or threat to revenues. The slide below shows that globally 74% of respondents see IoT as an opportunity to improve their company’s Average Revenue Per User (ARPU). Only 10% see it more as a risk, and the balance (16%) believe it will not affect their ARPU.

As the slide below also shows, there is considerable regional variation over whether the improvement in ARPU will come about through their own services or those of application partners. Almost six in ten (59%) of Western Europeans are confident that their own services will bring the improvement, compared to just 28% in CALA.


IoT -- Opportunity or threat to revenues? (Breakdown by region)
IoT — Opportunity or threat to revenues? (Breakdown by region)

The Neural Technologies survey also asked ‘Which of the following is the most important factor in successful risk management?’ According to the respondents, key factors in successfully combating revenue losses include sharing knowledge (cited by 41% of respondents globally), and almost as important optimal revenue management systems (40%), while 11% say improved services (either internal or from third party consultants), and 9% say ‘Other factors’ are most important.

Even here, there is huge variance. In all, 83% of North Americans suggest that enhanced fraud management systems are most important, while only 17% of those in the Middle East agreed. No respondents in SE Asia described Improved Services as the most important factor, yet it was the key objective for 43% in CALA.

Regional risk management factors

Of course, fraud-related revenue losses have always been a key factor for CSPs, and the survey is a reminder that there are companies like Neural whose focus on these issues has not wavered. Telcos should welcome the report as there has been a dearth of independent global survey data for a while – CFCA provides some valuable information, but its membership is more North America-focused and the data correspondingly narrower.

Source: Neural Technologies Global survey on Telecoms Risk, published January 2016. To request a copy of the Survey Report, visit:

In part 2 of this analysis we will look at the changing responsibilities at Board level, and some of the threats relating to connected consumer devices.

Comment on this article below or via Twitter: @IoTNow_  OR  @jcIoTnow



Self-driving technology firm Sensible 4 receives €8mn to boost sustainable transport

Posted on: May 19, 2022

Luxembourg & Finland. 19 May, 2022 – Sensible 4’s software enables vehicles to operate under the most challenging weather conditions, including snow, heavy rain, fog and sandstorms. Autonomous driving contributes to sustainable transport, reducing the number of traffic accidents and carbon dioxide and polluting emissions. It also provides a solution to the shortage of public

Read more

Wyld and DEWA partner to launch new satellite IoT network and service for utilities sector

Posted on: May 19, 2022

19 May 2022 – The Dubai Electricity and Water Authority (DEWA) has launched its satellite called DEWA-SAT1 and Wyld Networks has partnered with DEWA R&D Centre and Infra X, the telecoms arm of Digital DEWA, to develop IoT terminals to support the new satellite IoT network. Wyld is responsible for delivering the satellite IoT terminals

Read more

9 IoT applications that will change everything

Posted on: September 1, 2021

Whether you are a future-minded CEO, tech-driven CEO or IT leader, you’ve come across the term IoT before. It’s often used alongside superlatives regarding how it will revolutionize the way you work, play, and live. But is it just another buzzword, or is it the as-promised technological holy grail? The truth is that Internet of

Read more

Which IoT Platform 2021? IoT Now Enterprise Buyers’ Guide

Posted on: August 30, 2021

There are several different parts in a complete IoT solution, all of which must work together to get the result needed, write IoT Now Enterprise Buyers’ Guide – Which IoT Platform 2021? authors Robin Duke-Woolley, the CEO and Bill Ingle, a senior analyst, at Beecham Research. Figure 1 shows these parts and, although not all

Read more

CAT-M1 vs NB-IoT – examining the real differences

Posted on: June 21, 2021

As industry players look to provide the next generation of IoT connectivity, two different standards have emerged under release 13 of 3GPP – CAT-M1 and NB-IoT.

Read more

IoT and home automation: What does the future hold?

Posted on: June 10, 2020

Once a dream, home automation using iot is slowly but steadily becoming a part of daily lives around the world. In fact, it is believed that the global market for smart home automation will reach $40 billion by 2020.

Read more

5 challenges still facing the Internet of Things

Posted on: June 3, 2020

The Internet of Things (IoT) has quickly become a huge part of how people live, communicate and do business. All around the world, web-enabled devices are turning our world into a more switched-on place to live.

Read more

What is IoT?

Posted on: July 7, 2019

What is IoT Data as a new oil IoT connectivity What is IoT video So what’s IoT? The phrase ‘Internet of Things’ (IoT) is officially everywhere. It constantly shows up in my Google news feed, the weekend tech supplements are waxing lyrical about it and the volume of marketing emails I receive advertising ‘smart, connected

Read more