Who’s directing the traffic? The need for regulation of autonomous vehicles

Regulation is usually presented as a burden to business. The default position of politicians keen to win the corporate vote is to promise to cut ‘red tape’ and free up innovation.

However, this is just a caricature. Companies certainly dislike bad regulation. But sensible, targeted regulation can deliver commercial benefits. Businesses themselves are sometimes among the loudest voices calling for regulation in areas where it does not already exist. This is especially true in relatively young industries, where the superficial attraction of an innovative ‘Wild West’, freed from government control, is often illusory.

A case in point is that of autonomous and connected vehicles (AVs), for which there is little or no well-designed regulation at present, says John Cooper, partner, and Kieran Laird, principal associate, both at Gowling WLG.

The need for regulation

AVs have the potential to improve our lives in many ways. However, their biggest promise is safety. The majority of road accidents are caused when a driver makes a bad choice. AVs should make us safer by removing the driver from the decision-making process, and relying instead on a set of pre-programmed algorithms that determine how the AV reacts in certain situations.

John Cooper
John Cooper

Regulation of these algorithms is important for two reasons.

Firstly, any safety benefits of AVs are directly proportional to their take-up. Take-up requires that the public trusts the technology – trust is essential to us relinquishing the control that we currently have as drivers, and becoming comfortable with entrusting our safety to algorithms.

Regulation has a large part to play in creating that trust by standing behind the algorithms that are used and assuring that they are safe, ethical and reliable.

Secondly, in order to ensure that the benefits of AVs are realised, some degree of uniformity will be required in how the algorithms of different manufacturers deal with real world situations. Although co-operation within the industry may go some way to achieving this, at some point regulators are going to need to step in and make choices. Until that time, companies developing this technology are working at risk.

It is for these reasons that many want to see regulatory certainty sooner rather than later.

What should regulation look like?

So how does regulation work in a relatively young industry that is still in a state of developmental flux?

The fundamental requirement is a clear regulatory framework which facilitates the introduction of new products and provides the legal certainty needed to ensure that companies are not working at risk.

Kieran Laird
Kieran Laird

As a rule, the application of old law to new technology does not work. It is a bad fit, and stifles product development and innovation.

So new law is required that accommodates products in advance of them being produced. Without this, those products will be slow to come to market, or be more expensive as companies need to price in the costs of regulatory uncertainty. In either case, product take-up will be frustrated by the regulatory system.

Current developments on either side of the Atlantic exhibit very different reactions to this challenge. The UK government is taking an incrementalist approach, which explicitly aims to follow technological development rather than get ahead of it. At this stage, the UK’s focus is on changes to insurance conditions for AVs and basic amendments to traffic laws that permit individual technologies which are already in development, such as remote control parking.

In contrast, the US Department of Transportation has published an ‘Automated Vehicles Policy’ which recognises the need for a root and branch reappraisal of regulation in order to put in place a structure that enables the new technology to flourish.

Rush Hour Traffic on the M6 MotorwayThe US approach shows much greater vision, and we prefer it. It correctly frames the issue in terms of legality, safety and commerciality, and the need for regulation to strike a balance between these three aims.

Given their benefits, governments should seek to encourage the take-up of as many AVs as possible, as quickly as possible. This means that regulation, for once, needs to get ahead of the curve. For this, law-makers need to show clarity of purpose, co-ordination (both at state level and internationally), and a clear vision for how regulation drives growth. Huge rewards are available to the countries that grasp this more quickly than their international competitors.

The authors of this blog are John Cooper, partner, and Kieran Laird, principal associate, both at Gowling WLG

Comment on this article below or via Twitter: @IoTNow_ OR @jcIoTnow

FEATURED IoT STORIES

9 IoT applications that will change everything

Posted on: September 1, 2021

Whether you are a future-minded CEO, tech-driven CEO or IT leader, you’ve come across the term IoT before. It’s often used alongside superlatives regarding how it will revolutionize the way you work, play, and live. But is it just another buzzword, or is it the as-promised technological holy grail? The truth is that Internet of

Read more

Which IoT Platform 2021? IoT Now Enterprise Buyers’ Guide

Posted on: August 30, 2021

There are several different parts in a complete IoT solution, all of which must work together to get the result needed, write IoT Now Enterprise Buyers’ Guide – Which IoT Platform 2021? authors Robin Duke-Woolley, the CEO and Bill Ingle, a senior analyst, at Beecham Research. Figure 1 shows these parts and, although not all

Read more

CAT-M1 vs NB-IoT – examining the real differences

Posted on: June 21, 2021

As industry players look to provide the next generation of IoT connectivity, two different standards have emerged under release 13 of 3GPP – CAT-M1 and NB-IoT.

Read more

IoT and home automation: What does the future hold?

Posted on: June 10, 2020

Once a dream, iot home automation is slowly but steadily becoming a part of daily lives around the world. In fact, it is believed that the global market for smart home automation will reach $40 billion by 2020.

Read more
RECENT ARTICLES

Python developers now have native access to powerful multimodel data platform

Posted on: October 28, 2021

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. 27 October, 2021 – InterSystems, a data technology provider dedicated to helping customers solve the most critical scalability, interoperability, and speed problems, announced that its InterSystems IRIS data platform now features full native support for Python, unleashing the power of the popular programming language for creating data-intensive, mission-critical applications.

Read more

Opt-in software-based government – Nationality as a Service (NaaS)

Posted on: October 28, 2021

The government functions to serve and represent its citizens, but around the world, citizens experience substandard public services with minimum transparency.  The governments fail to support individuals and communities efficiently. The services provided in many parts, from education to health, are broken.

Read more