A new approach to testing GPS receiver resilience, and not just for military users

Testing a GNSS receiver’s response to RF interference used to be a pretty major undertaking.

One of my first ever projects in the GPS world was to test anti-jam antenna systems to evaluate how they coped with signal jamming.

In those days it was difficult to create wholly realistic scenarios with injected RF interference in the lab. So, to conduct the test, we set up scaled-down jammers on an open test range located in the South East of the UK. One of my abiding memories is of having to be vigilant over calibrating and adjusting the signal level of the jammers so that the interference we caused wouldn’t spill out beyond the range and interfere with nearby equipment, says Guy Buesnel, CPhys, AFRIN.

The unintentional effects of open-air jamming tests

Voyage of the prototype single stage to orbit rocket
Voyage of the prototype single stage to orbit rocket

Collateral damage is something of an occupational hazard when it comes to large-scale, open-air interference tests. In 2007, a US Navy jamming exercise near San Diego knocked out cellular networks in the city, which were unable to synchronise time while GPS signals in the area were being jammed. And in April 2015, a US Air Force interference test in Idaho caused significant disruption to GPS-reliant agricultural businesses operating nearby.

But, while they can be disruptive, those kinds of tests are utterly necessary – and not just for military users of the GPS system. Today, it’s also critically important for commercial manufacturers to understand how their location-aware systems perform in the presence of RF interference.

GNSS interference is becoming more common

That importance is growing for two reasons. Firstly, interference to GPS and other global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) is becoming more common, mainly due to more people buying illegal jammers for personal use. At a conference I attended in June, over 70% of the attending equipment manufacturers, professional users, designers, and system integrators agreed that GNSS interference is getting worse.

Guy Buesnel, CPhys, AFRIN
Guy Buesnel, CPhys, AFRIN

And secondly, humankind’s reliance on GPS and GNSS is growing fast. It’s an essential element in connected and autonomous vehicles. It drives precision agriculture, construction and mining. It sits at the core of consumer products like exercise trackers and games like Pokémon GO (whose runaway success is sure to usher in a whole wave of location-based augmented-reality games).

And that’s only on the geolocation side. GPS and GNSS also play a critical role in precision timing for everything from mobile networks to power grids and financial trading systems. In 2011, the US Department of Homeland Security said that 15 of the country’s 19 “Critical Infrastructure and Key Resources” sectors relied to some degree on GPS-based timing.

So understanding the resilience of a GPS-based system to interference is essential.

The author of this blog is Guy Buesnel, CPhys, AFRIN

Comment on this article below or via Twitter: @IoTNow OR @jcIoTnow

Recent Articles

Hitachi Capital, Yokogawa and amnimo partner to view IIoT equipment status

Posted on: March 27, 2020

Hitachi Capital Corporation, Yokogawa Electric Corporation, and amnimo Inc., a subsidiary of Yokogawa, have struck a new partnership agreement. The aim is to provide new services by adding Industrial IoT (IIoT) to each company’s technologies, know-how, and lease equipment.

Read more

Veeva data cloud to deliver new approach for patient and prescriber data

Posted on: March 26, 2020

Veeva Systems, has announced Veeva data cloud to help support the industry by bringing greater innovation and choice to the data market. Veeva data cloud will include longitudinal patient and prescriber data offerings that will cover retail and specialty distribution channels, initially tailored for commercial use cases such as launch planning, patient segmentation, commercial analytics,

Read more