How to select the optimum service type for the smart home

Blake Kozak, principal analyst, Security & Building
Technologies, HS Technology

One of the most daunting tasks for any platform or device vendor in the smart home market is identifying which type of company offers the best opportunity for long-term success – security providers, multiple service operators (MSOs), smart home specialists, do-it-yourself (DIY) smart-home systems or utilities.

Security providers currently dominate the North American market, and will continue to do so throughout 2021, says Blake Kozak, principal analyst, Security & Building Technologies, IHS Technology, in a new research note.

However, their share of installed smart home systems are forecast to drop from 60% in 2014 to 50% in 2021, as other providers offering smart-home products expand into more consumer segments. According to the IHS Smart Home Intelligence Service, the DIY smart home system segment share of smart home systems will rise from 11% to 17% between 2014 and 2021. This segment is gaining momentum through retail channels, with an estimated 114,000 new systems in 2015.

Multiple system operators (MSOs) experienced a growth slowdown in 2013 and 2014, due to the saturation of early-adopter consumers. Growth will increase again in 2016 as MSOs use marketing campaigns to generate more interest in smart-home services in the wider consumer market; however, pressure from the DIY segment in 2020 and 2021 will cause MSO growth to slow again.

Utilities will also begin to carve out a section of the market, but they will not provide more than 4% of systems by 2021, even as they begin to partner with smart-home devices and systems alongside demand-response programs. There are already projects in the United States where customers may enroll a smart thermostat into a demand response program, in order to save money and help energy providers control load.

Most smart-home products have an ongoing cloud-based service element to enable remote interactivity with in-home devices and the dynamic creation of scenarios that change the way various devices interact with each other. Despite the current domination of these types of products, self-monitoring will challenge the central monitoring station paradigm over the next five years. This paradigm shift will not only bring a change in the way systems are monitored, but also in how police respond.

Two of the primary reasons for this market shift are advances in technology and a reduction in false alarms. Smartphones are an example of a technology advancement that lets users receive alert messages and video directly from their security systems, anywhere in the world. DIY systems that are properly installed with video verification will lead to fewer false alarms to police departments, compared to professionally monitored systems, because all that matters is visual verification and the ability of the caller to report a crime in progress.

Of course each type of company comes with its own unique challenges and opportunities. As a participant in the smart-home market looking for long-term success, analysing and evaluating each company type is critical – but we cannot ignore the effect that non-subscription self-monitoring products will have over the next five years.

The author of this blog is Blake Kozak, principal analyst, Security & Building Technologies, IHS Technology.

Comment on this article below or via Twitter: @IoTNow_ OR @jcIoTnow

FEATURED IoT STORIES

9 IoT applications that will change everything

Posted on: September 1, 2021

Whether you are a future-minded CEO, tech-driven CEO or IT leader, you’ve come across the term IoT before. It’s often used alongside superlatives regarding how it will revolutionize the way you work, play, and live. But is it just another buzzword, or is it the as-promised technological holy grail? The truth is that Internet of

Read more

Which IoT Platform 2021? IoT Now Enterprise Buyers’ Guide

Posted on: August 30, 2021

There are several different parts in a complete IoT solution, all of which must work together to get the result needed, write IoT Now Enterprise Buyers’ Guide – Which IoT Platform 2021? authors Robin Duke-Woolley, the CEO and Bill Ingle, a senior analyst, at Beecham Research. Figure 1 shows these parts and, although not all

Read more

CAT-M1 vs NB-IoT – examining the real differences

Posted on: June 21, 2021

As industry players look to provide the next generation of IoT connectivity, two different standards have emerged under release 13 of 3GPP – CAT-M1 and NB-IoT.

Read more

IoT and home automation: What does the future hold?

Posted on: June 10, 2020

Once a dream, iot home automation is slowly but steadily becoming a part of daily lives around the world. In fact, it is believed that the global market for smart home automation will reach $40 billion by 2020.

Read more
RECENT ARTICLES

Infineon and Rainforest Connection create real-time monitoring system to detect wildfires

Posted on: October 22, 2021

Munich and San Jose, California, 21 October, 2021 – Infineon Technologies AG a provider of semiconductors for mobility, energy efficiency and the IoT, announced a collaboration with Rainforest Connection (RFCx), a non-profit organisation that uses acoustic technology, Big Data and Artificial Intelligence / Machine Learning to save the rainforests and monitor biodiversity.

Read more

Infineon simplifies secure IoT device-to-cloud authentication with CIRRENT Cloud ID service

Posted on: October 21, 2021

Munich, Germany. 21 October 2021 – Infineon Technologies AG launched CIRRENT Cloud ID, a service that automates cloud certificate provisioning and IoT device-to-cloud authentication. The easy-to-use service extends the chain of trust and makes tasks easier and more secure from chip-to-cloud, while lowering companies’ total cost of ownership. Cloud ID is ideal for cloud-connected product companies

Read more